Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners table audit engagement letters amid concerns about dates and deliverables
Summary
Board members asked to delay signing a set of audit and consulting engagement letters because several contract dates and deliverable deadlines in the draft agreements appeared out of date or passed; staff will clarify terms with the auditors and return the items to a future agenda.
County commissioners reviewed several letters of engagement for consulting and audit services and raised multiple concerns about dates, deliverables and whether the county had received the expected prior-year audit report.
Board members questioned inconsistent or past dates in the draft consulting and budget assembly agreements (references to fiscal years ending Nov. 30 with differing year numbers and fee estimates tied to specific fiscal-year language), and asked staff to confirm when those services would cover and whether consulting work already performed was included. On the audit contracts, commissioners said a summary had been presented previously but that the complete audit report had not been received and that several deadlines referenced in the engagement letters (including an item due May 1) had already passed.
The board agreed to skip or table those letters of engagement and requested staff and the prospective auditors resolve date inconsistencies, confirm the status of prior audit deliverables and provide corrected documents for board review. No contracts were signed at the meeting; the item was continued for follow-up.
