Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sustainability Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MMSD sustainability lead outlines goals: 20% reduction since 2019, 50% by 2035 and design changes for referendum schools
Summary
New MMSD sustainability lead reported about a 20% reduction in greenhouse‑gas emissions from a 2019 baseline so far, outlined goals to cut operational emissions 50% by 2035 and pursue net‑zero by 2045, and described grant pursuits, geothermal and solar integration in forthcoming referendum school designs.
Madison Metropolitan School District staff reported progress and plans for sustainability tied to the district’s building referendum and operations.
Brianna Craigler, the district’s new sustainability lead in building services, told the operations work group the district has established a 2019 baseline and is at least about 20% below that baseline so far. Craigler said that figure reflects a combination of LED lighting projects, a three‑megawatt solar farm and fleet changes; the district has a formal goal to reduce operational greenhouse‑gas emissions 50% from the 2019 baseline by 2035 and to reach net‑zero operations by 2045.
Why it matters: The sustainability work will shape design and equipment choices for the 10 schools funded by the referendum, affect lifecycle operating costs, and influence grant eligibility and potential federal incentives.
Key planning elements and grants: Staff outlined several strategies for new and renovated school buildings: geothermal heating and cooling where feasible, demand‑control ventilation, energy recovery units, high‑efficiency lighting and attention to the building envelope to lower long‑term energy use and embodied carbon. The district is pursuing grants including a parking‑council recycling grant and a potential $350,000 “community resilience hub” grant that the city of Madison may help pursue; staff said the grant’s future is uncertain at the state level but that they will continue to seek funds.
Referendum integration and timeline: Building services and the referendum design team are working through schematic‑design milestones (50% SD in the current phase). Scott (owners‑rep/project lead) said the design work remains in an early detailed phase and indicated sustainability staff are coordinating with architects and construction managers to lock in envelope, HVAC and landscape decisions before detailed design. The district plans dashboards and monitoring panels at high schools to track energy performance; staff said they are troubleshooting data sync issues with MG&E.
Costs, tradeoffs and examples: Craigler discussed tradeoffs such as where solar capacity yields the best return versus selling back energy at low wholesale rates, and constraints such as well‑head protection zones that can limit geothermal depth. She said choices will be made to balance upfront costs, lifecycle savings and grant/incentive opportunities, and that some measures such as electrifying the fleet are already being prioritized where practical.
Board reaction: Board members pressed for specifics — how geothermal feasibility varies by site, the percentage of fleet vehicles already electrified, and how curriculum and student engagement will be integrated with sustainability features. Staff said they will develop clearer metrics and short‑term goals (e.g., number of schools with gardens, outdoor learning spaces, compost pilots) to guide grant decisions and measure progress.
Next steps: Sustainability staff will continue utility‑data verification with MG&E, refine the 2019 baseline numbers, develop measurable goals and coordinate with the referendum design team during the remaining schematic and detail design steps.
