Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Referendum Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MMSD advisers propose about $200M initial bond sale split into taxable and tax‑exempt slices; parameters sought for market timing
Summary
Financial advisers told the school board the district can deliver an initial borrowing of roughly $200 million to start spending referendum proceeds, split to preserve investment flexibility. The advisers recommended a taxable slice to avoid federal arbitrage rules and a larger tax‑exempt slice; board will consider a parameters resolution May 19.
Get email alerts on the Referendum Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisers to the Madison Metropolitan School District presented a plan to the operations work group on Monday to issue an initial borrowing of roughly $200 million to begin paying referendum‑authorized project costs.
The advisers from PMA and Baird recommended splitting the initial issue into a taxable portion and a tax‑exempt portion so the district could invest proceeds more flexibly and avoid federal arbitrage constraints on tax‑exempt bond proceeds. Under the plan presented, the taxable slice would be relatively small and short‑term while the larger tax‑exempt slice would carry the longer amortization.
Why it matters: The $507 million referendum voters approved authorizes multi‑year borrowing to fund 10 new or rebuilt schools and related projects. The initial borrowing and the structure of the debt affect when contractors are paid, how much interest the district pays, and the property‑tax levy the district will set in future years.
Key elements of advisers’ recommendation: Advisers said they expect to seek about $200 million in the first sale, split into a taxable tranche (roughly $29 million, as presented) and a tax‑exempt tranche (roughly $171 million). They said the taxable slice avoids federal arbitrage constraints and could increase interest earnings for the project while being outstanding for a short period; the tax‑exempt tranche would carry the primary borrowing for the projects. Advisers proposed parameters that would allow some flexibility on the day of sale — for example, authorizing up to about $181 million tax‑exempt and up to $40 million taxable so they can adjust the split if market conditions favor it.
Interest rates and timing: The advisers reviewed recent municipal market volatility and said borrowing costs remain comparable to historical levels for 20‑year debt. They proposed targeting a sale in early June with a closing scheduled to allow proceeds to be deposited by June 30 so the district can meet fiscal‑year timing and potential pre‑purchases. The advisers asked the board to consider a parameters resolution at its May 19 meeting that would authorize dollar caps, not‑to‑exceed interest rates and delegation of final signature to the board president or vice president so staff can time the sale to market conditions.
Levy and mill‑rate context: The advisers showed a preliminary amortization that would hold the district’s debt‑service levy near the figure publicized during the referendum campaign — an increase of roughly $30 million in annual debt levy relative to current levy — with a projected mill‑rate impact near the estimate the district provided voters. Advisers said they would continue to refine estimates as the market and execution details evolve.
Board follow‑up: The board did not authorize the sale at the operations meeting. Administration and bond counsel will prepare parameters language for the May 19 board meeting; the advisers said they will monitor market conditions and pick a sale date within the delegated parameters so the board will not be forced to sell on a particular scheduled meeting date if the market is unfavorable.

