Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears residents’ concerns about permit survey age; staff to analyze rule and report back
Summary
Council members and building officials discussed the town’s 3‑year survey requirement for permits; staff reported surrounding jurisdictions commonly use 1‑ to 2‑year standards and agreed to return with options.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members, staff and several residents debated whether the town’s three‑year maximum survey age for permitting remains appropriate, with staff saying neighboring jurisdictions are stricter and building officials advising caution in extending the limit.
Town staff told the council that building officials and engineers they consulted generally prefer a three‑year survey limit and that Palm Beach County and most neighboring municipalities typically require surveys one year old or newer. "We surveyed the 6 cities around us. They're at 1 or 2 years. They do not do 3 years. So we're actually the most lenient of anybody," Joe (staff) said. Building officials cited underground changes—such as relocated drain fields—or other alterations as reasons a recent survey is important.
Several residents described instances where older surveys complicated permit work. Resident Jennifer Chanowski described a seawall and dock permitting sequence in which the survey requirement had delayed permitting and added cost. Realtor Sher (identified as a local realtor during public comment) told the council that older surveys had produced discrepancies in several waterfront transactions and urged the town to keep surveys current, particularly for waterfront parcels where erosion or seawall issues can change a boundary.
Council members asked staff to return with comparative information and options. Staff agreed to research whether the town should reduce the age requirement to five, two or one year and to outline potential consequences for homeowners and for town review processes. No ordinance or formal change was voted on at the Jan. 14 meeting.
Staff emphasized that some permit matters (for example, changes visible in town records or permitted work) may not require a new survey while other work—especially work on seawalls, docks or property lines—commonly requires current documentation. "Sometimes I got an answer, sometimes I didn't. But...they said 3 years, you're gonna forget what you've done under that property after 3 years," a town official said, summarizing building-official feedback.
The council requested a follow-up report comparing local practice, mortgage industry norms and the potential fiscal impact on residents who must commission new surveys when making improvements.

