Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy Homeschooling topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County votes to send resolution opposing HB 2827 and declaring support for homeschooling freedoms to full board
Summary
After public testimony from a home-school advocate, the committee voted to advance a resolution opposing House Bill 2827 and to designate Effingham County a sanctuary county for homeschool and private-school freedoms; members requested further local input from education officials before final board action.
A county committee voted to advance a resolution opposing House Bill 2827 and to designate Effingham County a sanctuary county for homeschool and private-school freedoms, after public testimony and discussion about oversight and enforcement.
Committee member Chris introduced the resolution and said he supported it as a defense of parental authority. Coral Weber, identifying herself as a home-educating mother and organizer, addressed the committee and urged passage. "Children belong to God, the family, and then the state," Weber said, arguing HB 2827 would erode parental rights and allow state-level intrusion into family education decisions. Weber said she and other families had incorporated an organization, the International Alliance for Freedom in Home Education, and had been in contact with national legal groups in case of litigation.
Members questioned enforcement and oversight. One committee member asked whether there is a state requirement to file a notice of intent to homeschool; Weber said Illinois is among the least regulated states for homeschooling and that she was not aware of such a notification requirement. County legal staff and another member noted that statute governs how far counties can go and requested clarification from the regional superintendent of schools and other local agencies on truancy, child-welfare reporting and enforcement mechanisms.
Several committee members said they oppose the bill in principle but expressed differing views about the wording of a sanctuary-county resolution. One member warned that language saying the county "shall not enforce" rules that "infringe" parental rights could be subjective and might tie the hands of entities that must enforce state law. Another asked for a presentation from the regional superintendent and county offices that handle juvenile and child-welfare matters to better understand how homeschooled children who are not receiving adequate instruction are identified and helped.
After discussion, committee member Chris moved to advance the resolution to the full board for consideration; Sandra seconded the motion. The motion passed at the committee level and will be placed on the full board agenda for final action.
Background: Testimony at the meeting referenced a 2019 legislative hearing on similar proposals. Weber named the Coalition for Responsible Home Education (CRHE) as an organization advocating model legislation she opposed and said the American Center for Law and Justice had indicated it would support litigation if a bill were enacted that the group believed violated constitutional rights. The committee did not adopt a final sanctuary ordinance at this meeting; members asked staff to invite the regional superintendent and county officers to provide additional information before the full board acts.
