Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park board accepts developer-funded Rolling Prairie Conservancy sign after close debate on design and precedent
Summary
The Park and Recreation Board approved a developer-funded sign for the Rolling Prairie Conservancy and dog park; members weighed uniform city park signage against developer branding and agreed to accept the donated, higher-end sign with a roll call vote.
The City of Portage Park and Recreation Board voted to accept a developer-funded sign for the Rolling Prairie Conservancy and dog park, approving the proposal after discussion about sign style, site work and precedent for developer branding in city parks.
Jeff Vine, development consultant for the Gums (the subdivision developer), said the sign and related site work — trimming two trees, relocating boulders and restoring landscaping — are part of improvements the developer will pay for and that the same logo and branding will appear on wayfinding signs and a masonry monument within the subdivision.
"It's a huge amenity," Vine said. "When all phases of the subdivision are built out, there's gonna be 600 to 700 people that are gonna be living in Rolling Prairie." He said the proposed sign is part of marketing the subdivision and that the developer would like the sign to match the subdivision branding.
Parks staff noted the city uses a standardized park sign family across its park system; the city’s sign replacements cost roughly $1,700–$1,800 for the standard sign and city crews install them. Board members discussed whether accepting a different-style sign would set a precedent for future developers.
Supporters of accepting the donated sign said the developer's offer also covers about $10,000 of site restoration work and would spare the city those costs. One board member said, "If they're willing to do the work and put the sign out, then I don't see why we can't just allow them to." Another board member said the sign was "a very nice sign" and that refusing the offer would require the city to perform and fund additional site restoration.
After discussion the board moved and seconded approval. A roll call vote recorded unanimous approval (Dunnehy: yes; Amrath: yes; Carlson: yes; McReese: yes; Sulik: yes; Bernander: yes; Donahue: yes). The board chair said he hoped the sign could be installed before the local Parade of Homes.
