Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Scientists and institution leaders say proposed 15% indirect‑cost cap would cripple small labs and slow clinical trials
Summary
Witnesses and senators told the Appropriations Committee that an across‑the‑board 15% cap on indirect (facilities & administrative) costs would cause layoffs, force research institutions to withdraw from projects and make it harder to run clinical trials, especially at smaller or non‑endowed labs.
At a Senate Appropriations hearing on biomedical research, institutional leaders and committee members warned that a proposed across‑the‑board 15% cap on indirect costs would threaten the ability of many research institutions to host grants and run clinical trials.
Dr. Herman Haller, president of the Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory in Bar Harbor, Maine, described indirect costs — often called facilities and administrative costs — as the funds that pay for lab space, compliance staff, microscopes, security and shared services that make grant-funded experiments and trials possible. “Independent research institutions like mine, without a large endowment and without revenues from tuition, we are dependent on the present system of indirect cost reimbursement,” Haller said. He added that a 15% cap “endangers our work and the work of all the other independent…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
