Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident urges censure of deputy selectman; alleges selective enforcement and personal misconduct

3268475 · April 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment Joan Coe urged the Board of Selectmen to censure Deputy First Selectman Steven Antonio for allegedly violating meeting decorum and selective enforcement of zoning and other rules; Coe cited previous meeting comments, a fireworks incident, and alleged social-media allegations as reasons for censure.

At the April 21 public-comment period, resident Joan Coe urged the Board of Selectmen to censure Deputy First Selectman Steven Antonio for violating the board’s rules of decorum and standards of conduct.

Coe read an excerpt of the board’s procedures (she referenced “Section 162-4” as the relevant decorum provision) and recited minutes from the board’s March 24 meeting in which she said Antonio spoke as an individual and defended his record. Coe said she had included a link to the SCTV recording of the March 24 meeting for the board’s review.

In her remarks Coe alleged selective enforcement of zoning rules, described a past Fourth of July fireworks incident at Antonio’s residence that she said resulted in the fire marshal confiscating illegal fireworks, and referenced social-media allegations of illegal activity that she said had not led to formal action. Coe characterized these issues as evidence of preferential treatment and asked the board to censure Antonio for violating decorum and for discriminatory responses by the board to public commenters.

Board members did not act on the request during the meeting; Coe said her remarks would be posted on social media later.

Ending: Coe’s request for censure was recorded in public comment and no board action or formal response was taken during the meeting audio.