Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Utility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ridgewood Water proposes $25.1M budget, flags PFAS, lead-line work and an 11.5% average rate increase
Summary
Ridgewood Water presented a $25.12 million 2025 budget and a proposed rate package that would raise the average residential annual bill about 11.5% as the utility advances PFAS treatment plants, lead-service-line replacements and distribution upgrades.
Get email alerts on the Water Utility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rich Kalbi, general manager of Ridgewood Water, and Business Manager Michael Kors presented the utility’s 2025 proposed budget of $25,123,197 at the council’s Feb. 3 meeting and outlined major capital and regulatory drivers.
Kalbi said about $19 million of the proposed total supports 2025 operating requirements and roughly $6 million covers debt service. He explained that more than half of the utility’s debt-service burden for 2025 is tied to the utility’s PFAS treatment master plan, which requires construction of multiple treatment plants and raw-water mains to connect satellite wells.
PFAS and infrastructure: Ridgewood Water is in a multi-year program to install PFAS treatment. Kalbi said 12 plants are needed across the system; two are in service, six are under construction, and he expects additional contracts to break ground this year. The utility also has roughly 52,000 feet of raw-water main planned to connect 21 wells; about 9,500 feet are in the ground.
Lead-service-line replacement and water‑quality work: Kalbi said the utility has replaced about 800 utility‑side lead service lines to date and coordinated replacements with about 200 private‑side customers. The water utility will put out a four‑town contract this year that would allow coordinated replacement to proceed on a larger scale.
Rates and customer impact: Ridgewood Water proposed a rate package that includes fixed facility charges, a PFAS surcharge and volumetric usage charges. Under the proposal, the typical 5/8‑inch residential meter customer using the historical average of 7,000 gallons per month (about 70,000 gallons annually) would see an estimated annual bill rise of roughly $80, about an 11.5% increase over 2024. Kalbi said the majority of water-rent revenue (about two‑thirds) comes from variable usage and is therefore sensitive to weather.
Nut graf: The budget ties major near‑term cost pressure to regulatory demands — PFAS treatment plant construction, lead-service-line replacement, and distribution improvements — and proposes a rate increase to spread the costs across the customer base.
Next steps: The water utility will publish supporting materials and the council will discuss the rate proposal at a March work session; the ordinance introducing water rates is scheduled for March 12 and final reading is set for April 9.
Ending: Kalbi and his team said they are seeking grant and federal assistance where possible and have engaged financial consultants to review the plan; staff and council members asked for continuing updates on grant applications and timeline milestones.

