Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District attorney briefs Board of Equalization on open-meeting rules and conflicts of interest
Summary
Rand Greenberg, a representative of the district attorney’s office, reviewed open-meeting restrictions and ethics guidance for board members, advising caution about serial one‑on‑one conversations that could become a quorum and explaining disclosure and abstention rules for conflicts of interest.
Rand Greenberg of the Elko County district attorney’s office briefed the newly assembled Board of Equalization on open‑meeting law, conflict-of-interest disclosure and abstention practices at the start of the Feb. 13 session.
Why it matters: Board members and other appointed officials must follow open‑meeting statutes and disclose conflicts to preserve public trust and avoid votes being invalidated. The briefing clarified routine steps members should take when potential conflicts arise.
Key points from the briefing - Do not discuss board business in groups that create a quorum: Greenberg warned that sequential conversations among members risk becoming closed deliberations when three or more members communicate about pending matters. - One-on-one contacts: Members may discuss agenda items one‑on‑one but should avoid allowing that conversation to be relayed through a chain of members that creates a quorum. - Conflicts and disclosures: Specific conflicts (gifts, financial interest, or significant private commitments) must be disclosed and may require abstention; the district attorney’s office offered to review potential conflicts and advise members when possible. - Evidence on the record: When members propose valuation adjustments they should state the evidentiary basis (e.g., appraisal, inspection) so the record supports the board’s action.
Board follow-up: Members asked how to time disclosures and whether to make them at the agenda item or earlier; Greenberg recommended disclosures be made when the item is called but encouraged earlier contact so the DA’s office can advise in advance if necessary.
Ending: The board thanked Greenberg; the DA’s office offered to be available for pre-meeting conflict consultations.
