Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Foundation Survey Youth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community foundation to dig deeper after survey; youth survey and communications planned
Summary
The meeting reviewed results from a recent community health and wellness survey, noted generally high life‑satisfaction but flagged under‑served subgroups, and described plans for a youth survey, targeted research on cohorts, and a communications plan.
Commissioners and local foundation representatives told the Health and Human Services Commission that community survey results show generally high life satisfaction but also identify subpopulations with elevated needs.
Barb Akimov, commission chair, said the foundation’s summary shows “86% of respondents are either satisfied or very satisfied with their life,” and that “more than two‑thirds do not have barriers to accessing physical health care and mental health services.” At the same time, the commission and foundation representatives said the survey pointed to smaller groups — residents with financial insecurity, multiple caregivers in a household, residents aged 30–59 and other cohorts — whose needs merit further study.
Planned follow‑up work: The foundation will fund and commission deeper dives into those specific cohorts, and the Behavioral Health Fund within the community foundation may be available to support pilot programs. Commission members said the foundation will complete its annual grant cycle in June and then re‑examine survey findings against grant priorities.
Youth survey: Commissioners said the foundation has funding to conduct a youth survey and will work with schools to implement it if the schools agree. Commissioners emphasized several planning issues that must be resolved before fielding a youth questionnaire: the content and age range of questions, whether surveys are conducted in school or another controlled setting, parental notification and consent, and how to avoid wording that might inadvertently distress or “trigger” respondents. Several commissioners said conducting the survey in schools could offer a more controlled environment and higher participation, but they also acknowledged potential parental concerns and the need for careful question design.
Communications and action: The group discussed creating a communications plan to make resources easier to find and to roll out information about services. John Favre and others recommended that the Behavioral Health Alliance and local nonprofits synthesize available resources so residents know where to seek help. Commissioners said the foundation’s deeper analysis should inform both program development and public information efforts.
Ending: Commissioners asked foundation representatives to return with more detail on implementation logistics for the youth survey and on planned uses of the Behavioral Health Fund. They also proposed a smaller commission subgroup to review priorities and produce actionable recommendations this summer.
