Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recycling Fee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Polk County committee reviews one‑year recycling charge pilot and projected fund balances
Summary
Committee members heard staff projections showing a recycling fee could make the county recycling center self‑sufficient and discussed implementation details, affected properties and next steps in the budget process.
Polk County committee members reviewed staff projections for a one‑year pilot recycling charge and discussed how the fee would affect levy funding and individual property assessments.
Staff presented two budget scenarios: one that includes the recycling charge and one without it. With the charge, staff projected the recycling fund would start 2026 with about $11,668, grow to roughly $205,239 by the end of 2027, and reach about $263,810 by the end of 2028. Staff said revenue from the fee would be used to pay wages, fringe benefits and equipment for the recycling center so “nothing will come out of the levy itself.” The staff presentation included side‑by‑side figures showing the same capital and operating needs without the charge would be paid from the county levy and estimated at about $2.26 million by the end of 2028.
Why it matters: committee members framed the charge as a budget mechanism intended to shift costs off the general levy and preserve levy capacity for other priorities such as law enforcement and road programs. Staff described the fee as experimental and said continuation would be decided through the regular budget process.
Committee discussion and clarifying details Staff said 24,070 properties in the county were assessed the recycling charge while the county has 41,066 total properties; properties classified as agricultural or otherwise exempt were not assessed. When asked about specific caller concerns, staff summarized six calls they had received about the charge, including two out‑of‑state cabin owners who objected because they haul recyclables out of state, and one parcel that appeared to be an assessor error; staff said they planned to follow up with the assessor.
Supervisor Jeremy Hall asked whether out‑of‑state cabin owners were charged; staff replied, “No. They are charged. They live out of state. So they felt they didn't need to pay” because they take recyclables out of state. Supervisor Tony Johnson asked about the fee equivalence to property value; staff said a 21¢ per thousand levy shift is approximately breakeven for a property assessed at about $163,000 and confirmed that the $35 flat recycling fee is roughly equivalent to that property value level.
Next steps Staff said decisions about continuing, adjusting or ending the fee will be handled during the county’s regular budget process and that the public will have opportunities for comment when the budget is considered. The committee did not take formal action to end or extend the pilot during the meeting.
