Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board adopts state density bonus law into local code to align Inyo County with state rules
Summary
The Board adopted an ordinance replacing chapter 18.65 with the State Density Bonus Law to eliminate conflicts, add required definitions and comply with the county's 6th-cycle housing element; staff said the change prevents future local/state conflicts and is exempt from CEQA.
The Inyo County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing and adopted an ordinance on March 11 that replaces the county’s density bonus overlay (chapter 18.65) with the State Density Bonus Law in its entirety, Planning Department staff said.
Planner Danielle Viswania explained the county ordinance—originally adopted in 2004 and updated in 2007—no longer tracked subsequent state changes. She said the local code omitted required provisions (for example, protections and inclusions for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans, homeless tenants and certain low‑income students) and contained numerical conflicts with the state law on density percentages and developer concessions.
Viswania said the county’s adoption of the state law verbatim aims to prevent future conflicts when the state updates its density-bonus provisions. The Planning Department advised the change is a non-project action exempt from CEQA because it does not itself authorize development or change allowable uses.
Board members asked whether adopting future state updates automatically could limit the county’s ability to evaluate later state changes; staff said the county could amend its code in the future if a state change included provisions the county elected not to adopt, but noted the ordinance is designed to prevent mismatches between local code and a law that is complex and periodically updated.
After closing the public hearing with no public speakers, the board adopted the ordinance by voice vote. The transcript records the vote as carried; no roll-call tally was included in the record.
The ordinance adoption was framed by staff as part of implementing the county’s 6th-cycle Housing Element and was accompanied by a finding that the update is exempt from CEQA.
