Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Tdt topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners debate TDT funding for Chappie James memorial after TDC discussion; legal risk and DOR complaint noted
Summary
Escambia County commissioners on March 25 reopened discussion of Tourist Development Tax funding for a planned Chappie James memorial after the Tourist Development Council asked for more documentation and considered sending a complaint to the Florida Department of Revenue.
Get email alerts on the Tourism Tdt topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Escambia County commissioners on March 25 resumed discussion about a previously approved Tourist Development Tax (TDT) allocation for a planned Chappie James memorial and plaza after the county’s Tourist Development Council (TDC) expressed concerns at its recent meeting and requested further documentation.
County Attorney Allison (identified in the meeting by first name) and County Clerk Pam (Madam Clerk) briefed commissioners about the legal and administrative issues. Allison told the board that if the TDC moves forward with reporting the use to the Florida Department of Revenue (DOR) and DOR determines the expenditure is not an allowable use of TDT, the county could be obliged to repay the funds from general revenues; in a worst case, state funding streams could be at risk. “At the very least, I think you should expect that you may be obligated to repay the TDT with general funding sources,” Allison said.
Madam Clerk argued the memorial qualifies as a tourism venue under local interpretation of the statute and that constructing an open‑air museum and plaza would promote tourism and could be justified as a TDT expenditure. She said the board’s prior vote and promotional intentions support classification as tourism and that the county should ensure documentation showing how the project promotes tourism. The TDC chairman asked for a letter to DOR under a statutory complaint process; commissioners said the TDC’s vote made that a likely next step.
Commissioner Lumen J. May said he has long supported honoring Chappie James and that the board must decide whether it is going to proceed; he asked whether the clerk would pay the TDT award if the board decided to move forward. Pam replied she would process the payment only if the board clearly determined the project constituted tourism and the required documentation was in hand. Several commissioners said they wanted the county attorney and clerk to meet with the city attorney and the nonprofit foundation to nail down stewardship, maintenance, and documentation before further disbursement.
Ken Pyle, secretary of the Chappie James Foundation, told the board the foundation plans to maintain the memorial in perpetuity, expects private donations and an endowment to fund long‑term upkeep, and that the city would do routine park maintenance. He said the foundation expects to raise private funds and has a target endowment level that would generate annual maintenance income; commissioners asked for proof of those commitments.
What’s next: Commissioners directed the county attorney to meet with the city attorney and return with clarification on stewardship and documentation. The TDC is expected to take further action; if the TDC files a complaint with DOR, the county could face administrative review. The board did not rescind its prior vote but asked staff to complete outstanding steps before any payment.

