Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concord subcommittee outlines engagement plan, prioritizes youth outreach and public materials
Summary
The Town of Concord Permanent Memorial Subcommittee spent its Jan. 16 meeting compiling outreach activities aimed at three objectives — to raise awareness, engage the community and foster support — and agreed on near-term steps including reading student essays and updating the committee's statement of purpose.
Get email alerts on the Community Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Town of Concord Permanent Memorial Subcommittee on Jan. 16 compiled a list of public-facing outreach activities and agreed on near-term steps to advance community engagement for the proposed memorial.
The committee centered its discussion on three objectives: “raise awareness, engage the community, foster support,” a formulation presented during the meeting by Joe Palumbo, a subcommittee member. That framing guided a wide-ranging brainstorming session in which members proposed events, materials and partnerships to solicit public input over the next six months.
The list of suggested activities included: inviting student essay contestants to an event; conducting focus groups with existing community organizations such as the Council on Aging; staffing tables at community festivals and events; hosting forums and pop-up park gatherings on the memorial site; producing informational materials; coordinating with the Concord Museum on research and outreach; and exploring low‑barrier, technology-enabled engagement tools. Polly Reeve proposed inviting the 38 students who submitted essays to a group conversation; several members recommended prioritizing the five winning essays that are posted online for homework before the next meeting.
Members discussed when and how the committee might use the town’s April 19 events calendar as a placeholder for an activity on the memorial site and clarified that the placeholder does not mean a final design or model will be displayed that day. Tuohy Rogers, convening the meeting, said the April 19 slot is a venue option for an activity that advances the committee’s objectives and can be removed if the committee decides not to participate.
Subcommittee members emphasized using a consistent presentation and materials as a core next step. Several members volunteered to develop or co‑author outreach materials and a presentation the group could reuse as a “roadshow” for different audiences and times of day. Nancy (last name not specified) offered to present her compiled research on existing memorials and town markers as a possible forum item once she has time to prepare; members discussed aiming for an hour‑long presentation with time for questions.
The committee identified two specific next steps before the Jan. 23 meeting: all members agreed to read the five winning student essays posted online, and Tuohy Rogers and Polly Reeve agreed to draft an updated version of the committee’s statement of purpose for review at the next meeting. Members also asked the clerk to circulate a numbered list of the brainstormed activities before the next meeting so the group can prioritize.
The committee unanimously approved the minutes of its Jan. 9 meeting by roll call at the start of the Jan. 16 meeting. Tuohy Rogers called the meeting to order and led the roll call; recorded votes on the minutes were Aye from Christa Collins, Nancy (member), Joe Palumbo, Polly Reeve and Tuohy Rogers.
The subcommittee set the next meeting for Jan. 23 at 5 p.m. and assigned owners for follow-up items: drafting and circulating the activity list (Polly Reeve), drafting a revised statement of purpose (Tuohy Rogers and Polly Reeve) and preparing a reusable presentation and materials (volunteers to assist and coordinate). The committee also agreed to coordinate with the Concord Museum staff about research and possible joint public programming.
The meeting closed after a public‑comment period during which members of the public raised questions about the conceptual design and consultant selection; subcommittee members said they would confirm factual details with town staff and report back at a future meeting.
Members and public speakers repeatedly emphasized that the brainstorming session was exploratory: no final decisions on design, site uses, or permanent installations were made at the Jan. 16 meeting.

