Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development Incentives topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council defers vote on Lang Gen Y’s sales-tax exemption request after ROI and jobs questions
Summary
Councilmembers asked for more financial detail after hearing that the company sought only a sales-tax exemption for the $3 million renovation of a former call center; the council voted 7-0 to defer final action to the April 22 meeting so members can review property-tax and ROI estimates.
The City Council delayed action on a city-requested letter of intent to issue industrial revenue bonds for Lang Gen Y LLC’s plan to renovate the former Royal Caribbean call-center building into company headquarters, citing questions about job creation, return on investment and the impact on other taxing jurisdictions.
Assistant City Manager Troy Anderson said Lang requested revenue bonds in the amount of about $3,000,000 to finance renovations; the request at this stage is for sales-tax exemption only, not a property-tax abatement. Mark Elder, representing Lang Development, said the project is primarily a relocation and interior/exterior renovation and that the company expects to hire additional employees over time but did not provide a specific headcount.
Councilmembers pressed staff and the company for more detailed fiscal analysis. Councilmember Glasscock asked for an ROI calculation that shows when the city would recoup the value of the sales-tax exemption and asked if the company’s revenue mainly comes from outside Sedgwick County (a City guideline for certain incentives). Troy Anderson provided a rough estimate on the record that if the property’s assessed value doubled from $1.8 million to a higher level following a $3 million investment, the annual tax obligation could rise from roughly $200,000 to about $400,000, but he said he would present precise numbers later.
Councilmember Glasscock moved to defer final city action pending a special council meeting on April 22 so staff could provide more specific ROI and property-tax figures; the motion to defer passed 7-0. Staff said the request as presented was solely for a sales-tax exemption (approximate value of the exemption ~$112,000; city share ~$8,770) and that any property-tax abatement, if later requested, would be a separate decision.
