Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Risk Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves $705,000 standby letter of credit tied to city's workers' compensation policy

3190537 · March 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Finance Committee adopted Resolution 25-26 authorizing a standby letter of credit with WesBanco to collateralize the city's large-deductible workers' compensation policy; the letter amount is $705,000 and fees total $3,925.

The City of Charleston Finance Committee on March 17 approved Resolution 25-26, authorizing the mayor and city manager to enter a standby letter of credit with WesBanco to collateralize potential workers’ compensation claims under the city’s large-deductible policy.

Mister Machado, a city staff member, said the city would obtain a standby letter of credit in the amount of $705,000 for the benefit of Encova, the city’s insurer. "We would be entering into a letter of credit with WesBanco, standby letter of credit with WesBanco for the benefit of Encova in the amount of $705,000. That's the amount of the letter of credit that a very unusual situation where we don't actually need to draw on that, but it's a requirement because of a large deductible policy that we have," Machado said.

Machado told the committee the cost to the city would be one-half of 1 percent of the credited amount plus a $400 document fee; the staff-calculated fee for this letter came to $3,925. A committee member asked whether other banks were solicited; Machado said the treasurer’s office sought multiple quotes several years ago and the city has used WesBanco for a number of years.

Committee Chair called for a motion, and the committee adopted the resolution by voice vote; counts were not recorded. The motion on the record was "Move for approval of resolution." The transcript does not name a mover or seconder and does not record a roll-call tally.