Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cultural Heritage Disaster Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses cultural heritage disaster planning and who preserves Kingman’s historic properties
Summary
Commissioners and preservation liaisons discussed creating or adapting a cultural heritage disaster plan to clarify roles and responsibilities for historic properties in Kingman, including how the city would coordinate with the historical society, county and state archives after fires or other disasters.
Commissioners discussed what local responsibilities would be if a historic property were damaged or destroyed in a disaster and whether the city should help coordinate a cultural heritage disaster plan.
A representative for the local historical community said the county historical society’s mission now includes historic properties and that many preservation tasks will require multiple entities working together. The representative described a cultural heritage disaster plan as a form of “cultural heritage disaster relief plan” that would sit alongside broader emergency planning.
Commissioner Craig and other commissioners asked whether the commission wanted a draft plan, a concept to discuss, or a more formal step toward a coordinated response. City staff and a liaison (identified as Sylvia) said the city is “looking at” a cultural heritage disaster plan and suggested the commission could be a key participant; the liaison also noted the county is working with state archives and that the city could coordinate or “piggyback” on existing county/state efforts.
Why it matters: commissioners said the city holds or oversees many historic resources beyond downtown and asked for clarity on what the city can and should do when historic structures, artifacts or interpretive collections are threatened by fire or other disasters.
Details and questions raised: speakers noted examples from other communities where advance planning clarified who would protect objects in a building, how firefighters would avoid damaging specific items, and whether the city would assist with reconstruction or interpretation if a property were lost. Commissioners discussed whether the commission should ask multiple entities (fire department, historical society, commissioners, city staff) to define roles and recommended bringing a draft or workshop back to the commission for review.
Next steps: staff and the liaison said they would bring back either a draft Cultural Heritage Plan or a concept paper for further discussion at a future meeting. No formal action or vote was taken at this meeting.
