Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee quickly concurs in multiple Senate amendments on insurance bills
Summary
The committee recorded voice votes to concur in a series of Senate amendments to House bills covering varied insurance topics; each concurrence was brief and uncontroversial on the record.
Early in the session the House Insurance & Commerce Committee handled a string of short concurrence votes on Senate amendments to several House bills. Committee members introduced the bills briefly, sponsors explained that the Senate had corrected clerical or definitional language, and the committee voted by voice to concur on each amendment.
Bills addressed by short concurrence votes included corrections for terminology (for example replacing "registered lactation consultants" with "certified lactation consultants" in one bill), definition alignment with existing Employee Benefits Division policy for bariatric surgery coverage, data‑access clarifications for PBM licensure reporting, and clerical or FDA‑reference language changes for other health‑related measures.
A partial list of concurrence actions recorded on the committee floor (all by voice vote, as recorded in committee transcript):
- HB 133: Concurred in Senate amendment; corrected "registered" to "certified" for lactation consultants (sponsor: Representative Ashley Hudson). Outcome: concurrence passed. - HB 1424: Concurred in Senate amendment to align bariatric surgery coverage definitions with EBD (sponsor: Representative Lee Johnson). Outcome: concurrence passed. - HB 1602: Concurred in Senate amendment adjusting data access and reporting for PBM licensure and protecting certain data while allowing pharmacist access (sponsor: Representative Lee Johnson). Outcome: concurrence passed. - HB 1531: Concurred in Senate amendment clarifying manufacturer application review and FDA language (sponsor: Representative Baker). Outcome: concurrence passed. - HB 1700 and HB 1771: Concurred in clerical or technical amendments as described on the floor (sponsors: Representative Baker; Representative Mark Perry for HB 1771). Outcome: concurrences passed. - HB 1820: Amendment added additional exempted industries; concurrence passed (sponsor: Representative Matt Brown).
Why it matters: These are transactional, technical fixes and reconciliations between the House and Senate versions of bills; each was handled by unanimous or near‑unanimous voice vote and did not generate extended debate on the record.
What’s next: Each concurred amendment will be reflected in the enrolled bill language moving through the legislative process.
