Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wind Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee approves statewide wind-energy rules after heated debate
Summary
The House Insurance & Commerce Committee approved Senate Bill 437 to impose statewide permitting and siting standards for utility-scale wind projects while sponsors and opponents agreed to study the issue during the interim. The bill passed on a voice vote after hours of testimony from crop-dusting pilots, timber and renewable-energy groups.
The House Insurance & Commerce Committee on Monday approved Senate Bill 437, a measure that places statewide permitting, setback and other regulatory requirements on utility-scale wind projects.
Proponents said the bill creates a temporary regulatory framework while lawmakers study wind development over the interim; opponents called it an effective ban that would chill private landowner contracts and economic investment.
“I'm here to offer an alternative solution to this complex issue,” Representative Jeremy Wooldridge told the committee, urging a study that includes all stakeholders. Crop-dusting pilots and agriculture applicators testified at length about hazards they say turbines and meteorological towers present to low-altitude, precision aerial spraying.
Matt Willard, owner of Willard Flying Service, said turbines and small meteorological towers make applications “almost impossible for treatments,” and warned of safety risks and crop damage downwind from turbines. “The unregulated construction of wind turbines will only make this worse,” Willard said.
Developers and timber companies pushed back. Simon Mahan of the Southern Renewable Energy Association said SB 437 would amount to “an effective ban on wind energy,” and asked to be included in any interim process. Jackson Bridal of Weyerhaeuser warned the bill would “limit our ability to have a wind project to 0 acres” on the company’s holdings if the measure remained as written.
Sponsors and several members said the bill is intended to slow unchecked development so an interim study can produce a long-term, balanced regulatory approach. Representative Brad Hall, a sponsor, said the intent is to “get ahead” of development and that rules can be relaxed later if the interim work shows changes are appropriate.
The committee heard technical testimony on aviation regulations, Federal Aviation Administration review of turbine lighting and marking, and county-level permitting already used in some projects. Testimony also flagged economic and environmental tradeoffs, including local property-leasing revenue and timber/forest land use.
After discussion, the committee approved SB 437 by voice vote. The motion to do pass was made on the floor by Representative Eric Richardson; the chair recorded the result as a voice vote with the ayes prevailing.
Supporters said the bill provides minimum statewide rules and an opportunity for an interim study; opponents said the measure goes too far in restricting private landowner choices and could deter investment in rural Arkansas.
The bill now moves to the House floor. Sponsors and several witnesses urged stakeholders — developers, ag applicators, timber owners and local officials — to work together during the interim to refine any permanent rules.
