Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Cargo Containers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board asks staff to start text amendment easing rules on cargo containers in residential zones
Summary
Yuma County supervisors voted April 7 to begin a text amendment to county zoning rules to allow cargo containers as accessory uses in specified residential districts, to permit stacking in limited zones subject to building code compliance, and to consider containers for human occupancy if they meet standard building rules.
The Yuma County Board of Supervisors voted April 7 to initiate a text amendment to section 1106.01 of the county zoning ordinance to update rules governing cargo (shipping) containers. The proposal would permit cargo containers as accessory uses in certain residential zoning districts without a special-use permit, allow multiple containers on larger parcels, permit stacking in specified zones subject to building-code compliance and contemplate human occupancy if the units meet the International Building Code (IBC) and International Residential Code (IRC) and obtain building permits.
County planners presented the item as a response to public requests and a Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation. Javier Barraza, senior planner, summarized outreach to surrounding jurisdictions and stakeholders and provided draft language options for the board to consider. The county's Planning and Zoning Division noted three primary options: keep current restrictions, allow one container by right on small residential lots, permit multiple containers on parcels two acres or larger, and allow stacking in limited zoning districts with safety constraints.
Public commenters and some supervisors emphasized the security and durability of cargo containers compared with small backyard sheds. Aaron Soe, a resident who spoke in favor of the amendment, said the containers can reduce break-ins and recommended a monotone, desert-palette paint requirement to reduce visual clutter. "The safety and security that come from having a cargo container is much better than what sheds provide," he said.
Supervisor questions focused on development standards and neighborhood impacts. Planning Director Maggie Castro confirmed that accessory structures, including containers, must still meet development standards such as lot coverage, setbacks, rear-yard requirements and a 400-square-foot size cap on containers being proposed for some districts. Board members repeatedly raised concerns about front-yard placement and cumulative visual impacts in established neighborhoods.
After discussion the board voted to start the text-amendment process. The motion instructs Planning and Zoning staff to draft ordinance language consistent with the options presented and return to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board for public hearings. The motion passed; the record does not contain a formal roll-call tally.
Why it matters: The amendment would change when county property owners may place shipping containers on residential parcels, and whether they can be stacked or adapted for occupancy. Proponents argue the change offers secure, cost-effective storage and potential low-cost housing options; opponents warned about neighborhood compatibility, visual impacts and the need to retain a permitting tool for problem properties.
What happens next: Planning staff will draft a text amendment reflecting the board's direction, including development-performance standards (setbacks, lot coverage and size limits), suggested aesthetic controls (paint palette), and structural/safety requirements for stacking and occupancy. The draft will go to the Planning and Zoning Commission and back to the Board with public notice.
