Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Debt Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Howard‑Suamico officials recommend $10.6M defeasance to cut long‑term interest
Summary
District financial advisers recommended using roughly $10.6 million in available funds to defease (place in escrow) and retire 2039 and 2040 maturities of the district's 2018 bond issuance, a move officials say would avoid about $3 million in interest; the board will consider formal action at an April 28 meeting.
Howard-Suamico School District officials presented a recommendation April 7 to apply about $10.6 million of available funds to defease and retire debt maturing in 2039 and 2040 from the district's 2018 capital issuance. The recommendation came during an informational briefing; the board did not vote and staff said they will return on April 28 for a formal motion and approval.
The recommendation came from Eric Kass, director of public finance at PMA, who reviewed the district's outstanding debt and options for prepayment and defeasance. He said the district's 2018 borrowing was issued in two tranches and that certain maturities are callable in the future. "When funds become callable, you can prepay those without any penalty or any fees associated with that," Kass told the board.
Kass laid out two basic options: a straightforward prepayment of callable bonds when permitted, and a defeasance in which funds are placed in an escrow that pays interest until the call date, then retires principal. He said prepayment coordination fees are modest in the district's example (about $2,000 for DTC coordination) while a defeasance requires additional parties and higher fees (PMA noted an estimate of $15,000 plus bond‑counsel, CPA sign‑off and escrow agent fees).
Under the proposal discussed April 7, applying roughly $10.6 million to the $83 million tranche would eliminate the 2039 and 2040 maturities and shorten the remaining schedule to about 17 years. PMA's presentation estimated that change would avoid just under $3 million in long‑term interest expense. Kass and district staff framed the recommendation as a strategy to maximize interest savings while preserving flexibility for future planning.
Officials stressed the proposal is part of a two‑step process: the April 7 discussion was informational and the board will receive formal documents and a recommended motion at the April 28 meeting. District staff and PMA said they expect to provide detailed numbers, legal opinions and escrow mechanics before the board takes action.
No formal board action on defeasance occurred April 7; staff invited board members to submit questions and said Kass will be available virtually for the April 28 presentation.
Ending
District staff said the defeasance option will return to the board with full financial details, fee estimates and legal certifications before a final vote. If approved, the administration said it would execute the arrangement with the escrow agent and bond counsel as required.
