Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Corteir Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission backs zone change and development-agreement amendments for Corteir site; wastewater timing clarified

3140306 · March 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Coeur d'Alene Planning and Zoning Commission on March 11 recommended the city council approve zone changes and amendments to the Corteir annexation and development agreement, including rezoning about 14 acres to C‑17, relocating a proposed well site and allowing the wastewater department to align sewer upgrades with actual demand.

The Coeur d'Alene Planning and Zoning Commission on March 11 voted unanimously to recommend that the city council approve several changes to the Corteir annexation and development agreement, including a 14‑acre rezoning to C‑17 to allow commercial uses, a relocation of a municipal well site and changes allowing the city wastewater department to time sewer improvements to actual demand rather than a fixed schedule.

Why it matters: The package affects about 438 acres annexed to the city in 2023 and preserves a previously agreed cap on total residential units at 2,800. Supporters said the changes will let developers submit detailed plats and planned unit developments consistent with the city’s zoning rules, while city engineers gain flexibility to sequence costly sewer upgrades to match growth.

Sean (city planning staff) summarized the requests, listing three zone changes — including approximately 14 acres from R‑17 to C‑17 — and two development‑agreement amendments: (1) to allow broader “product‑type” flexibility so land uses that are allowed by the underlying zoning can be proposed without reinterpreting the original concept plan and (2) to permit the wastewater department to adjust timing and scope of required sewer improvements based on actual demand. He read constraints in the original agreement, including a 2,800‑unit cap and required public improvements, and said those core obligations remain in force.

Melissa Wells, president of Kootenai County Land Company LLC (the property owner/applicant), told commissioners the amendments are intended to clarify “general consistency” with the concept plan so the applicant can submit PUDs and subdivision applications that use product types already allowed in each zone. Wells said the changes are not intended to bypass public hearings: "We are not in any way looking to circumvent any kind of public hearing or city procedure," she said.

Mike Anderson, wastewater superintendent, described the sewer timing language to the commission. Anderson said the city’s lift station north of the site has more capacity than originally estimated and that delaying an immediate upsizing could avoid premature, oversized upgrades. He said any work to keep service uninterrupted would rely on bypass pumping during construction and that residents should not experience interruptions: "There will be a time where that lift station is down but we'll work around that and have some bypass pumping in place," Anderson said.

City engineer Chris Bosley answered traffic and stormwater questions. Bosley said each development phase must include traffic studies and city‑required mitigation; stormwater in the area will be managed primarily with vegetated swales and city standards will be applied on a phase‑by‑phase basis.

Public comment focused heavily on traffic, road wear and safety on nearby Hanley, Atlas and Hutter roads, and concern that phased development could increase shortcutting through neighborhood streets. Several speakers urged the city and state to accelerate larger corridor plans — including alternatives being studied in the ITD PEL (preliminary environmental linkage) process for regional improvements tied to the I‑90/Hutter corridor.

Commission discussion emphasized that the development agreement amendments leave core commitments intact — connectivity, school sites, trails, parks, the 2,800‑unit cap and required public hearings for individual plats/PUDs — while giving developers and city utilities clearer rules for how to submit and sequence future applications. Commissioners added a recommended condition: the commission asked that short plats be prohibited for the Corteir project so future subdivisions come through the public hearing process rather than via the administrative short‑plat path.

Votes at a glance - ZC‑2‑25 (three zone changes including ~14 acres R‑17 to C‑17; C‑17L/R‑3 swaps; well‑site relocation): motion carried unanimously (roll call: Commissioners Coppas, Ingalls, Messina, McCracken, Fleming — all aye). Mover: Commissioner Ingalls; Second: Commissioner Fleming. - Development agreement amendment (product‑type flexibility; wastewater timing aligned to demand; added recommendation to prohibit short plats): motion carried unanimously (roll call: Commissioners Ingalls, Coppas, Messina, Fleming, McCracken — all aye). Mover: Commissioner McCracken; Second: Commissioner Fleming.

What the decisions do — and do not — change - The amendments clarify that future PUDs and plats may propose any product types that are allowed by the adopted zoning for each zone; they do not remove the requirement for neighborhood notice, planning commission hearings and city council review for land divisions and PUD approvals. - The 2,800‑unit cap established in the 2023 annexation remains in place unless the city and developer negotiate and approve a development‑agreement amendment. - The wastewater timing language gives the wastewater department discretion to delay or re‑scope required sewer upgrades so work is done when needed and when it best fits the utility system; the department said delay will not create service interruptions for existing residents because bypass pumping and other operational measures will be used.

Looking forward: The applicant said it will return with the first PUD/subdivision application(s) for portions of the site; staff and commissioners noted those applications must include updated traffic studies and utility concurrency analysis. State and regional studies on east‑west and north‑south corridor improvements (ITD PEL study) remain separate but relevant processes that will be incorporated into future traffic analyses for Corteir.

The city planning commission appended its recommendation and will forward the zone‑change and development‑agreement amendment package to the Coeur d'Alene City Council for final action.