Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Charter commission weighs who the city attorney serves and whether council may retain outside counsel

3137494 · April 1, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners debated proposed charter language that would let either the mayor or a two‑thirds vote of city council remove the city attorney and considered provisions allowing the council to hire outside counsel; city attorney Greg Venker and counsel advised narrowing the scope for outside hires.

The Lansing Charter Commission examined competing proposals this week over the role and removal of the city attorney and whether city council should have a formal entitlement to hire outside counsel.

The commission reviewed staff-drafted language that would let either the mayor or a two‑thirds majority of city council suspend or remove the city attorney, with the other branch having a veto-style check in some drafts. Commissioners and counsel discussed due-process language, whether removals should be "for cause," and how any veto or override would operate under existing charter provisions.

City Attorney Greg Venker, who attended the meeting, told the commission his legal obligations are to the corporate entity of the City of Lansing, not to a single elected official. "My client is the corporate body of the city," Venker said, describing the…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans