Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administration Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Clay County court approves revenue certifications, appraisal-district amendment and pipeline permit; minutes approved
Summary
At the Clay County Commissioners Court meeting, the court approved routine minutes, certified $500 in additional revenue, approved an appraisal district budget amendment and granted a permit for an underground pipeline crossing; all procedural votes passed by general consent or unanimous votes.
Get email alerts on the Administration Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Clay County Commissioners Court recorded several routine approvals and formal actions by general consent or unanimous vote during the meeting.
The court approved the minutes of the previous meeting by general consent (vote recorded as 5-0). The court certified additional revenue in the amount of $500 from Target Midstream Services LLC related to a 6-inch poly pipeline project near FM 174; Commissioner Chase made the motion and the court approved it by general consent. The court also approved a resolution submitted by Lisa Murphy, chief appraiser for the Clay County Appraisal District, to retain $25,007.38 for building repairs and to distribute $300,876 (as cited in the appraisal-district submission) back to taxing entities; Commissioner Chase moved the resolution and the motion passed by general consent.
The court granted a permit and right-of-way order for Quail Ridge to construct an underground 6-inch poly pipeline crossing at County Line Road in Precinct 4. Commissioner Chase made the motion and the court approved the permit by unanimous consent; the county record noted the project is related to oilfield activity and will carry saltwater/injection flow that county staff says will remove some truck traffic from county roads.
Each of these items was approved on the consent calendar or by unanimous vote during the meeting; no additional conditions or budget appropriations were attached in the court’s discussion as recorded.
