Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears Placer AI presentation; discussion focuses on cost, use cases and return on investment
Summary
Economic development staff and a Placer AI representative demonstrated place-based foot‑traffic and trade-area analytics. Council asked staff to gather case studies, ROI examples and peer-city references for budget consideration.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The North Ogden City Council received a 15‑minute demonstration of Placer AI’s place‑based analytics software during its meeting. Scott Hess, the city’s economic development and community development director, introduced the presentation and said staff had been discussing use cases for about 18 months. Chris, a Placer AI product specialist, demonstrated how anonymized mobile-location data can show visitation counts, event attendance, visitor origins, route heat maps and retail leakage.
Hess described potential uses: economic development marketing, retail recruitment, parks planning and traffic/route analysis. Chris showed sample reports from the crossroads shopping center and North Ogden Park, including a Cherry Days spike in July, ZIP‑code trade‑area breakdowns and “best-fit” retailer suggestions. He said Placer aggregates opt‑in mobile app location data and estimates visits using a multi‑year dataset. “We study places, not people,” he said, and added the company’s sample size covers roughly 10% of the U.S. population.
Why it matters: Council members and staff framed the question as whether a city of North Ogden’s size should buy an ongoing data subscription (staff quoted a two‑year price of roughly $21,200 per year or $24,000 for a single year) versus contracting occasional consultants for one‑off reports. Several council members expressed interest in retail leakage reports and in applying the data to parks, event sponsorship and traffic planning.
Key council takeaways and next steps - Cost and ROI: Council members asked for peer‑city case studies and examples showing measurable return on investment. Council members Dalpaz and Blake asked for references of similar-sized cities that had clear payback. Chris said Placer has case studies and offered to share them with staff. - Use cases beyond economic development: Council members and staff noted potential savings or better targeting for parks maintenance, snowplow routing and event sponsorship revenue. - Procurement timeline: Scott Hess said a Placer AI subscription is in the proposed 2025–26 budget; council members asked staff to gather references (Riverdale and other Utah cities were mentioned) and to present ROI analysis during budget deliberations.
What council did not decide: There was no vote to purchase Placer AI. Council asked staff to gather additional references and ROI information and to return to the council as part of the budget process.

