Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Infrastructure Roofs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Wagoner County commissioners table final actions on courthouse roof repairs and exterior waterproofing

3089510 · April 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extensive discussion about verification of waterproofing and outstanding punch-list items, the Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners voted to table final acceptance and payment for roof and waterproofing work and directed further inspections and coordination before release of funds.

Wagoner County commissioners on Tuesday discussed progress and outstanding items for multiple courthouse roofing and waterproofing contracts and voted to table final acceptance and related payments pending additional inspections.

The discussion centered on verification of a transparent water‑repellent applied to brick and cast stone on the courthouse exterior. The contractor reported the intended verification method would be a visual water test using a pump‑up sprayer to confirm the surface repels water rather than absorbs it; the contractor said the test and associated lift access had been canceled and would need to be rescheduled. The contractor also said the testing and visual checks are part of his contract and will not generate a separate change order.

County staff and commissioners pressed for clearer documentation, an on‑site presence during testing, and participation by the waterproofing company. County staff said the manufacturer requires 72 hours of cure time before testing. Commissioners asked that the contractor coordinate with County facilities staff and the waterproofing subcontractor so county representatives can observe the test. One commissioner said the waterproofing company should be present during verification; another asked for written pay requests and warranty documentation before any final payment.

To avoid releasing funds prematurely, the board approved having the county prepare a check but not release it until staff confirms completion. The board then voted to table final acceptance and payment until the requested inspections and documentation are completed and confirmed by staff. Commissioners also asked staff to provide pay requests and warranty documents for the board’s review.

The board did not find that additional cost will be incurred for the proposed water test; the contractor said the lift and the testing are already within his contracted scope. Commissioners and staff agreed to reschedule testing with on‑site witnesses and to revisit final acceptance at a future meeting.

The motion to table was made by Commissioner James and seconded by Commissioner Randy; the motion passed by roll call.