Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Supreme Court wrestles with whether Medicaid "any qualified provider" clause creates private right
Summary
At oral argument in the Supreme Court case captioned Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (No. 23‑1275), justices pressed counsel on whether the Medicaid "any qualified provider" provision creates a private right enforceable under 42 U.S.C. §1983.
At oral argument in the Supreme Court case captioned Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (No. 23‑1275), justices pressed counsel on whether the Medicaid "any qualified provider" provision creates a private right that beneficiaries may enforce in federal court under 42 U.S.C. §1983.
Petitioner’s counsel, Mister Bursch, told the court that the statute lacks the kind of explicit, rights‑creating language this Court has required in prior cases. He argued Congress did not use the word "right" or its functional equivalent and instead placed the provision among many state plan requirements, within a "substantial compliance" framework that leaves enforcement primarily to the secretary. "Congress did none of that here, and the court should not read the any qualified provider provision as though Congress did," Bursch said, stressing Gonzaga and this Court’s subsequent decisions as setting a high bar…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
