Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permits And Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yarmouth Conservation Commission continues several hearings, accepts a withdrawal, and approves two certificates of compliance
Summary
The commission tabled or continued multiple notices of intent (including one for lack of quorum), accepted a withdrawal without prejudice, continued a disputed addition that raised enforcement questions about an unpermitted hot tub, and approved two certificates of compliance for the Vallone property.
At its Feb. 20 meeting the Yarmouth Conservation Commission took a series of procedural and substantive actions: it continued or tabled several hearings, accepted a withdrawal without prejudice, continued a filing that revealed unpermitted work (hot tub and patio) tied to mitigation concerns, and issued two certificates of compliance.
Key items and outcomes
- Rosangela Colliero (SE80‑32463, 59 Oyster Cove Road): The commission found no quorum available for that agenda item and tabled the hearing to March 6, 2025. Staff noted Commissioner Mulhern’s recusal and the inability to proceed without a quorum.
- Alexander Niemanoff (SE80‑32452, 2 Buttercup Lane): The applicant withdrew the notice of intent without prejudice because they had not obtained a waterways recommendation; the applicant intends to refile after the waterways recommendation is secured.
- Bridal and Patricia Clifford (SE80‑32461, 36 Bent Bluffs Lane): The commission continued the application to March 20 after staff and commissioners flagged two issues discovered in the review: the site had not been staked before the hearing (a filing requirement) and an unpermitted hot tub and patio (constructed in 2020) lie within the 50‑foot buffer and may require mitigation or removal. The applicant’s consultant, Brad Holmes (ECR), agreed to provide mitigation spacing, planting details, and to review permit history; staff will send the old certificate of compliance and as‑built materials to the consultant.
- 10 Buttercup Lane (SE83‑2462, Craig Ferrari/Down Cape Engineering): The commission continued the fixed pier/stairway proposal to March 6 to resolve questions about minimum 5‑foot clearance at mean high water, the proposed down‑into‑the‑water steps, and whether steps should be seasonal to reduce debris risk. Commissioners recommended the applicant verify mean high water clearance in the field and consider seasonal components (in/out April 1–Nov. 1) if permanent steps remain.
- Great Island Homeowners Association (SE83‑2464): Applicant requested a continuance; the commission continued the item to March 6.
- Certificates of compliance: The commission voted to issue two certificates of compliance for Lisa and James Vallone (SE80‑31477 and SE80‑32383, 63 Smiths Point Road); the motion carried unanimously.
The commission also discussed enforcement and administrative process: members urged stricter adherence to the filing checklist requirement that sites be staked prior to hearing, and staff noted they have begun sending reminders but that staking remains listed as a required application item. Commissioners said continued noncompliance should be addressed through regulation or stricter hearing management to avoid repeat continuances.
Why it matters: The continued hearings and the Clifford review illustrate how unpermitted structures inside buffer zones can trigger mitigation or enforcement and can delay permitting for otherwise routine additions. The staking requirement and coordination with waterways and shellfish advisory bodies affect timing and permit completeness.
The commission adjourned after taking the votes noted above.
