Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County advisory group outlines barriers to 70% renewable electricity by 2030 and pilots a New Paltz corridor
Summary
A county-appointed renewable-energy planning group reported it is on track for roughly 40% local renewable electricity under current conditions but proposed steps — including coordinated interconnection planning, flexible interconnection and agrivoltaics — to accelerate toward a 70% goal; the group described a New Paltz pilot project as a model.
Tom Conrad, representing the county’s REIT (renewable energy/implementation) working group, briefed the committee on findings and recommendations for reaching the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) target the county has endorsed: 70% locally generated renewable electricity by 2030. Conrad said the group’s baseline assessment indicates the county is likely to reach only about 40% under current grid and permitting conditions.
Conrad emphasized that the primary bottleneck is interconnection capacity on the distribution grid and the way utilities plan upgrades. “The current grid could only potentially get to 25% to 30% renewable without being upgraded,” Conrad said, adding that a 70% target would require proactive planning and likely grid upgrades that go beyond individual project responsibility.
The working group outlined several pathways to accelerate buildout, including coordinated project corridors to pool interconnection upgrades (a pilot in New Paltz), flexible interconnection approaches that allow curtailment during limited hours, incentives for grid upgrades from regulators such as the Public Service Commission, and the adoption of agrivoltaics to reduce siting opposition. Committee members discussed options for county-level action, including working with towns on permitting, supporting pilot projects (including a solar-agrivoltaics pilot tied to the county’s Government Operations Center) and pressing state regulators on incentives and approval of new grid technologies.
Tom Conrad and planning staff recommended returning to the committee with a short list of actions the county can pursue, prioritized by what the county can influence directly and what requires state-level regulatory change.
