Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Liquor Licenses topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Des Moines council approves five-day Class C liquor license for Hy‑Vee event

3049979 · March 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a March 18 special meeting, the Des Moines City Council approved a five-day Class C retail liquor license for Hy‑Vee at 100 Locust Street for an event scheduled March 22, 2025; the motion passed by a 7-0 roll call.

The Des Moines City Council approved a five-day Class C retail liquor license for Hy‑Vee, 100 Locust Street, for an event scheduled March 22, 2025, during a March 18 special meeting.

The motion to grant the five-day Class C retail liquor license was moved and seconded and carried on a roll-call vote, recorded as seven yes, zero no.

Council members identified on the meeting record included Rosen, Simonson, Voss, Coleman, Westergaard, Mandelbaum and Gato. During the roll call on the liquor-license motion the following responses were recorded: Bauson — yes; Simonson — yes; Voss — yes; Coleman — yes; Westergaard — yes; Mandelbaum — yes; Gato — yes. The clerk announced “7, yes” and the motion carried.

The special meeting opened with a roll call and the agenda was approved by voice vote before the liquor-license item was taken up. After the license vote, the council moved to adjourn, and the meeting concluded without further recorded discussion or public comment.

No statutes, ordinances or staff reports were cited in the meeting record provided. The transcript does not record any public comments, conditions attached to the license, permit fees, or additional permitting requirements.

The action allows Hy‑Vee to serve alcohol under a five-day Class C retail liquor license for the specified event on March 22, 2025; additional approvals or requirements (if any) beyond the council vote were not specified in the meeting record.