Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves higher city contribution to three officers' family health plans after premium drop
Summary
After reporting an unexpected near-51% drop in insurance premiums, University Heights' council approved increasing the city's contribution toward officers' family health insurance for officers who opted in; vote was 4-0 (one absent).
The University Heights City Council voted by voice vote Feb. 11 to approve a motion to increase the city’s contribution toward officers’ family health insurance for officers who opted into family coverage. The motion carried 4-0, with one council member absent.
City Administrator Troy told the council that insurance premiums unexpectedly fell about 50.93% as of January, reducing the city’s employee-only monthly cost from $1,172 to $575 — a $597-per-officer monthly savings on employee-only coverage. Troy said three officers have since opted into family plans and that raising the city’s contribution for family coverage from the current 50% to 75% would add about $216 per month for each of those three officers while the city would continue to realize the reduced employee-only costs.
Troy told the council the savings were already budgeted in a $62,000 line-item for insurance costs and he asked the council to “consider passing on some of the savings the city’s realizing this latter half of this fiscal year.” The council considered a motion, which was seconded, discussed briefly by council members and by Police Chief Chris Acres (who said the officers appreciated the change), and then carried by voice vote; the clerk announced “Motion carries 4 0 with 1 absent.”
The meeting transcript does not record the exact motion text read into the record (for example whether the change is retroactive to the start of the fiscal year or effective going forward); council members discussed both options but did not record a specific retroactivity instruction in the public minutes. City Attorney Steve Cool advised that a simple motion and second would suffice to proceed to a vote.
No additional funding source beyond the existing insurance appropriation was identified; staff said the insurance line remains expected to be under-spent for the fiscal year and that any permanent change would be negotiated in future contracts or budgets.
