Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda Weather Forecasting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Smithfield committee approves consent agenda after questions about $1,500 precision weather service
Summary
The Smithfield School Committee approved its consent agenda, including routine invoices, after members questioned a $1,500 charge for a precision weather-forecasting service used in the district's snow-removal RFP. Administration said the service helps time delays and cancellations and is justified by operational needs.
The Smithfield School Committee on Jan. 16 approved its consent agenda, which included regular invoices totaling $430,587.83 and a $1,500 invoice for a precision weather-forecasting service used with the district's snow-removal contract.
Committee members asked for clarification about a line on the bills described as "precision weather forecasting." A school operations staff member explained the district uses the paid service in conjunction with the RFP for snow removal to measure actual snowfall at ZIP-code level and to talk in real time with a meteorologist about storm timing and duration. "Every storm is different and they change as they go along," the staff member said, adding the service helps the district time delays and cancellations and reconcile contractor claims about plowing depth.
The questioning member noted the $1,500 fee seemed excessive compared with free local weather apps. The staff member responded that the paid service can be worth its cost in a single storm because of more detailed timing, duration and measurement data and the ability to speak with a meteorologist while a storm is occurring. The staff member said the district also uses WeatherWorks tied to the RFP for measurement and that the town and other agencies use additional forecasting tools.
Committee members asked how the district decides whether to approve such recurring services and whether similar services paid for by the town duplicate district purchases. The business manager and other staff explained many bills before the committee are payments on previously encumbered purchase orders and that the committee's vote at the meeting is typically a warrant-to-pay rather than the moment a contract is approved.
After discussion, the committee approved the consent agenda by voice vote. One member said the district should consider reviewing duplication of services next year when contracts come up for renewal; another asked staff to track the accuracy and usefulness of the paid forecasting service over the coming season.
Votes at the meeting recorded that the consent agenda was approved by voice vote; a roll-call tally or individual counts were not provided in the minutes.
The committee moved on to other agenda items after the vote.
