Committee approves substitute requiring math and science teacher-prep programs to consult content experts

Representative Schmaltz introduced House Bill 4152 and an H-1 substitute that adds “or content experts in science” and “or content experts in math.” Schmaltz told the committee the bill would require the Michigan Department of Education to “by 2027 to only approve teacher preparation programs or alternative teaching programs in math and science if they were developed in consultation with a professor or content expert, specializing in that specific subject area and to revoke any programs that do not meet this requirement.”

Schmaltz said the requirement aims to ensure programs use evidence-based teaching methods and current subject-matter knowledge so “teachers are well equipped with the knowledge so that teachers and students can thrive in the classroom.” Vanessa Kessler of Launch Michigan appeared with the sponsor and spoke briefly in support.

Committee members asked how the bill defines “content expert.” Representative Colazar asked, “How are you defining a content expert? Because I don't see any definition of that in the bill.” Schmaltz and Kessler described content experts broadly as professors, professionals or longtime practitioners in math and science; Schmaltz acknowledged the concern that a definition could be more specific and called the feedback “good”.

Representative Weiss asked whether the bill would hinder “Grow Your Own” or other local programs that help diversify the teacher pipeline; speakers said the bill empowers MDE to review program quality and does not add steps to individual certification pathways.

The committee adopted the H-1 substitute (clerk recorded 11 yeas, 0 nays) and later voted to report House Bill 4152 as substitute H-1 with recommendation (the clerk recorded on the transcript that the committee had “6 yeas, 0 nays” when reporting the bill). Support cards were filed by David Randalls (Oakland Schools), Beth Deshone (GLP Education Fund), and Dan Quisenberry (MAPSA); Olivia Ponte (MDE) filed opposition on the record.

Committee discussion focused on definitional clarity for “content expert” and whether some programs already meet the standard; members suggested adding specificity about qualifications for content experts as the bill moves forward.