Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge higher pay, multilingual hiring and resources for Flathead County law enforcement
Summary
Multiple residents told commissioners that rising costs of living and shifting demographics require higher pay and additional resources to recruit and retain deputies and other law enforcement personnel in Flathead County.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several residents urged the Flathead County Board of Commissioners to increase compensation and resources for local law enforcement, saying the county’s changing demographics and rising costs of living make competitive pay necessary to retain deputies.
Ed Rosado of Summers said county residents rely on timely, competent law enforcement responses and argued deputies should receive competitive wages and incentives. “Law enforcement is like insurance,” Rosado said. “It’s a service that we hope we never need.” He suggested the county consider incentives for multilingual officers and other skills that aid recruitment and retention.
Tanya Edstrom, a volunteer with extensive local public-safety experience, described working for multiple local agencies and said she has observed strains in the justice system and the need for more deputies and detention capacity. She recounted previous warnings about staffing needs and urged the board to be more supportive of deputies and local police agencies, including “KPD, Whitefish PD, Columbia Falls PD, and Flathead County Sheriff's Office.”
Daniel Tipton also spoke about treatment at a planning meeting and added he supports the sheriff’s office.
No commissioner action on pay or budgets was taken at the meeting. Speakers framed their comments as requests for the board to consider compensation, possible housing allowances or other tools to retain law enforcement staff; several said they had volunteered in public-safety roles and had witnessed operational needs.
The board did not commit to specific budgetary changes during the session; commissioners acknowledged public concern and discussion of compensation was raised during the later contract vote.
