Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District 196 highlights 1:1 iPads, digital citizenship and the upcoming technology levy decision
Summary
District staff and teachers described the district—21:1 iPad program, classroom uses from elementary through high school, and lifecycle/maintenance plans; presenters said a funding renewal will be needed after this year to sustain the program.
Get email alerts on the Education Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District 196 staff updated the school board on the districtwide Technology for Learning program on April 14, describing classroom uses of 1:1 iPads, digital citizenship instruction and lifecycle plans for devices and network equipment.
Julie Bursack, the district—2 learning and technology specialist (self‑identified in the presentation), described the program—2origin as a 10‑year community investment to reach a 1:1 device ratio. She said the district—2learning and technology framework guides device use and that classroom decisions are driven by learning objectives rather than by devices alone.
Presenters emphasized that the iPads are one tool among many — used for differentiation, collaboration and to amplify student voice. Eric Davis, principal of Shannon Park Elementary, said 1:1 devices have shortened the time teachers need to assess students and let teachers act on assessment data more quickly. At the high school level, Tabitha Senti, a computer science and career‑tech teacher, described career pathways, real‑world projects (including cybersecurity and hardware simulations) and student hiring outcomes tied to technical skills gained in district classes.
District staff outlined a maintenance schedule: a four‑year life cycle for student devices and a 10‑year replacement cycle for network switches, routers and related hardware. Bursack told the board the district has achieved its 1:1 goal but said the community will need to renew funding after this year to maintain the program.
Board members asked questions and praised classroom examples shown in video clips. No board action was taken; staff said they will seek funding renewal discussions as part of future budget planning.

