Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators press for answers after sudden firing of General Hawk; warn of risks to cyber mission
Summary
Senators on the Cybersecurity Subcommittee condemned the sudden removal of General Hawk, urged the administration to explain the decision and warned it risks undermining continuity and deterrence in the cyber mission force.
Senators on the Senate Armed Services Cybersecurity Subcommittee criticized the sudden removal of General Hawk from senior cyber leadership and pressed the administration for clarity and accountability during a hearing with Lieutenant General Hartman of U.S. Cyber Command.
"His sudden and inexplicable firing is disrespectful to his service," said Senator Rosen, the panel's ranking member. She said the removal, which she described as occurring "in the dead of night with absolutely no consultation with Congress," risks undermining intelligence operations and continuity in cyber command and control.
Why it matters: Multiple senators said continuity in senior cyber leadership matters because national cyber operations require long training timelines and specialized expertise. They warned that abrupt personnel changes can damage deterrence, planning and relationships with industry and allies.
Senator Rosen argued the removal appears to have been influenced by an outside private individual and said it "compromises Cybercom and the NSA ability to keep Americans safe." She called for clarity from the administration and for Congress to demand answers and accountability.
Senator King echoed concerns about national deterrence in the cyber domain, saying capacity exists but that the United States lacks a clear doctrine that imposes cost on adversaries. "Do you agree with me that we need to have a more, stronger retaliatory capacity, number 1, and demonstrate the will to use it?" King asked during questioning. Hartman replied that Cyber Command is improving capabilities and developing options to deter and respond, and offered to provide additional detail in closed settings.
Chairman Rounds opened the hearing by acknowledging Hartman's service and thanking the witness and his family for their sacrifice. Hartman noted in his opening remarks that the cyber mission force has matured since its 2009 inception and emphasized continuity of operations under new leadership arrangements.
Ending: Senators said they would pursue further information and potential classified briefings. The panel requested that the administration provide a fuller explanation for the firing of General Hawk and that Cyber Command and others continue to brief Congress on force readiness and options to deter adversaries.
