Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K12 Accreditation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison educators report unanimous NEASC decennial findings; revised improvement plan due Oct. 1, 2025
Summary
School leaders told the Madison Board of Education that the New England Association of Schools and Colleges review found the district met all foundational elements and praised the curriculum, culture and leadership; the district must submit a revised school-improvement plan by Oct. 1, 2025 and progress reports thereafter.
Get email alerts on the K12 Accreditation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School leaders reported that the New England Association of Schools and Colleges’ decennial visit produced a positive accreditation report and confirmed that Madison met every foundational element the visiting team examined.
Janagozzi, a leader on the accreditation steering committee, read from the visiting team's written findings: “By making these capacities a focal point in instruction and assessment, the school reinforces their importance and ensures they're consistently prioritized in teaching and learning processes.” The visitors also commended the district’s curriculum completion, student-centered learning and collaborative teacher leadership.
Why it matters: NEASC accreditation is the regionally recognized review of school quality and continuous improvement. The visiting team’s confirmation that Madison met all foundational elements means the district is expected to retain accreditation, but NEASC requires a revised school-improvement plan to guide the next cycle of work.
Presenters walked the board through the five NEASC evaluation lenses — learning culture, student learning, professional practices, learning support and learning resources — and said the visiting team found the district met the foundational elements for each standard, including written curriculum for all courses, intervention strategies for learners and facilities that support programming.
Administrators identified three priority areas addressed before or during the visit: completion of the written curriculum, a common framework for professional learning community (PLC) meetings, and physical-space upgrades (HVAC, scheduling of shared spaces, and lighting/sound improvements for the theater). The visiting team recommended continuing the curriculum revision cycle, expanding PLC time and developing a long-term facilities plan.
Paul Mezic, a district staff member who led part of the accreditation work, said faculty groups have already begun drafting the next school-improvement plan. The district will convert steering-committee input into a consolidated draft for faculty review and must submit a revised plan to NEASC by Oct. 1, 2025; a first progress report is due Feb. 1, 2026, with subsequent checks in later years.
Superintendent Dr. Cook and board members praised teachers and counselors for the work. Board members noted the district met the review’s standards despite a long-term enrollment decline — administrators said district enrollment dropped from roughly 1,300 students to under 800 since a dozen years earlier — and commended the faculty-driven approach to leadership and curriculum writing.
Administrators said NEASC’s follow-up is routine: the visiting committee issues recommendations and the commission issues an accreditation letter; schools that meet standards continue in the accreditation cycle with periodic progress reports. District leaders said they do not expect any negative change in accreditation status and that the next decennial visit will be scheduled in the 2034 cycle.

