Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Gifts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Erlanger caucus debates raising gift disclosure threshold; straw poll favors $150 ordinance for council vote
Summary
Caucus members discussed raising the code of ethics gift disclosure threshold from $100, established in the early 1990s, and conducted a straw poll that favored sending a $150 threshold ordinance to the next council meeting for a formal vote.
Get email alerts on the Ethics Gifts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Peter, caucus member, opened discussion at the Erlanger City Council caucus on a proposed change to the city’s code of ethics gift disclosure threshold, saying the current $100 limit dates to the early 1990s and “doesn’t represent what we’re gonna be looking at tonight.”
The discussion focused on whether the $100 reporting threshold for gifts to city officers should be raised, and if so, to what level and how often the city should revisit that limit. “If we set a number today, will it be 24 more years or 25 more years until we look at it again?” Peter said, reporting he used an inflation calculator that showed $100 in 1991 would be roughly $237 in 2025.
Diana, caucus member, asked why the city should increase the threshold, saying, “Why would that even be an issue? Why would we want to increase that?” Sherry, staff member, responded that the ordinance was revised as recently as 2020 as part of the city’s ethics ordinance work and that reporting is intended to protect transparency. “I do think we need to know, especially if it’s to try to influence a decision,” Sherry said, arguing disclosure helps ensure gifts are not improperly influencing official actions.
Speakers offered a range of possible new thresholds. Peter suggested indexing the ordinance to inflation so the dollar amount would adjust automatically, pointing to other local statutory examples that use CPI. Caucus participants cited nearby cities for context: Fort Wright reportedly raised its threshold to $250; Covington raised theirs to $150 a few years ago. Several members noted routine, small-value instances — such as meals for police or firefighters or a dozen bagels for a meeting — can quickly count toward a calendar-year total.
A straw poll was held. A plurality favored keeping the threshold at $100, while a significant group supported $150; smaller numbers proposed $250. The caucus agreed to prepare language setting a $150 threshold and place that ordinance on the next formal council meeting agenda for a vote; caucus members said if the ordinance fails at council, the threshold would remain $100. No formal ordinance was adopted during the caucus meeting.
The caucus also agreed it is feasible to write an ordinance that ties the reporting threshold to an inflation index so the limit would adjust automatically over time, and asked staff to draft language accordingly. The meeting ended after a motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Recker, seconded by Ms. Chesler Lucas; an aye vote carried the motion.
Background: The proposed change would alter the reportable-gift threshold in the city’s code of ethics. Participants referenced the city’s earlier ethics ordinance work (noted as revised in 2020) and the model language from the Kentucky League of Cities. No formal vote on the ordinance occurred at the caucus; the $150 proposal will be circulated for a formal council vote at an upcoming meeting.

