Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Northville starts staff‑driven MICIP goal process to set measurable K–12 objectives

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The district described a multi‑year Michigan Integrated Continuous Improvement Process (MICIP) goal‑setting project driven by a K–12 teacher and staff committee to set measurable academic and nonacademic goals; the process will align goals to data, federal funding and district priorities.

Northville Public Schools staff briefed the board on work to adopt the Michigan Integrated Continuous Improvement Process (MICIP) and a staff‑driven K–12 goal‑setting process intended to produce measurable academic and nonacademic objectives.

District leaders said the K–12 committee — a cross‑section of teachers and staff who met multiple times across a two‑year period — developed an initial set of pillars (academic and nonacademic) and will produce measurable goals aligned to state reporting. The committee’s work will feed the district’s consolidated application and comprehensive needs assessment and will be uploaded into the state system for MICIP compliance.

Dr. Brock (district leader) said the process emphasizes teacher voice: staff helped create goals, will help implement them, and will be part of annual reviews and revisions. The committee also intends to align goals with Title‑I and other funding so that improvement strategies can be resourced.

Board members asked whether student and parent voice will be incorporated; district leaders said stakeholder input (including perception data such as Panorama) will be considered after staff goals are finalized and that the process includes annual review and possible adjustments.

No formal board action was recorded; district leaders and the board described the process as ongoing and data‑driven.