Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sensitive Lands And Wetlands topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board and watershed council press Bozeman to strengthen protections for sensitive lands, wetlands and parkland
Summary
Public commenters and board members urged the Sustainability Advisory Board to press the UDC process to better integrate the city's sensitive lands mapping, wetland protections and parkland dedication policies; city staff described existing local setbacks, federal wetland permitting and parkland-dedication requirements.
Members of the public and the board raised concerns about protecting wetlands, riparian corridors and other sensitive lands during future development.
Catherine Berry of the Gallatin Watershed Council told the board she and irrigators submitted written comments urging the sustainability board to add agricultural water-user facilities to the list of UDC discussion topics. "We submitted a comment with the Association of Gallatin Agricultural Irrigators this afternoon, urging the sustainability board to put agricultural water user facilities on that board discussion topics or areas of relevance list," Berry said, and she provided a policy memo for staff and board review.
Board members sought clarity on how "teeth" are applied to the sensitive-lands plan. Tom Rogers said the city uses the sensitive-lands analysis as an initial screening and requires site-specific determinations, including coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers where wetlands are implicated. He said the city enforces setbacks from watercourses (for example, a common 50-foot setback was described as illustrative for streams) and requires wetland and floodplain review during development permitting. Rogers also noted the city does not treat required riparian/wetland setbacks as the same as developer parkland dedication: "I will not let you take that as your parkland," he said, explaining that parkland dedication must provide recreational value and is separate from required environmental buffer areas.
Natalie and Rogers said the city currently lacks a local wetland bank; mitigation often occurs via cash-in-lieu or offsite mitigation under federal rules. The parks plan and a forthcoming park-related update (discussed in the meeting as a separate document) may identify ways to integrate sensitive lands and parkland dedication. Rogers said developers must coordinate with irrigation ditch owners and that the city's future land-use map guides where more intense development is expected. Public commenters asked planners to consider incentives for developers to clean up historically contaminated sites before converting them to housing.
