Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Demolition Delay Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norwalk Historical Commission reviews proposed demolition-delay ordinance revisions; notice, timelines and enforcement questioned
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a redlined draft based on Preservation Connecticut’s model ordinance that tightens definitions of 'significant' buildings, clarifies application content and retains a 120-day delay; members pressed staff about newspaper notification, when the delay clock starts, enforcement authority and fines.
The Norwalk Historical Commission spent the bulk of its meeting reviewing proposed amendments to the city’s demolition-delay ordinance intended to strengthen definitions and clarify procedures.
Staff told the commission the draft draws from the model ordinance produced by Preservation Connecticut and reorganizes and tightens definitions (including a new definition of "significant building") and the application content. Michelle, a city staff member, said the edits were prompted by recent cases in which renovations damaged older structures and by frustration among objectors about unclear responsibilities and timelines.
Commission discussion focused on three enforcement and procedure questions: how public notice should be provided, when the 120-day demolition-delay clock should begin, and whether the building department or the historical commission should play additional oversight roles during renovation. Commissioners raised the idea of adding newspaper publication in addition to on-site posting and online notice; staff noted state lawmakers are considering changes that would reduce newspaper-based public notice requirements and suggested a future online-notification option.
Commissioners debated whether the 120-day delay should start when an application is “deemed filed” (the language Preservation Connecticut recommends) or when a written objection is filed. Staff said the model language uses the application filing date; Michelle said she would consult the law and building offices about which start date is easier to enforce. "Preservation Connecticut uses the language of a hundred and 20 days starts once the application is deemed filed," Michelle said.
Members also pressed for clearer coordination with the building department to detect partial demolition or abrupt renovations that effectively destroy historic fabric without a demolition permit. Bill Ireland, identified in discussion as the chief building official, was described as already flagging some projects; staff agreed to discuss additional permitting checks and low‑cost procedural changes with Bill and building‑department staff.
The draft maintained a 120‑day delay period and kept language allowing the commission to hold a public hearing; it also preserved a penalty schedule that the draft lists as $250 per day up to $30,000 for illegal demolitions. Staff said enforcement is the building official’s responsibility, and commissioners asked staff to clarify how fines have been imposed in prior cases.
Commissioners discussed the Norwalk Historic Resources Inventory and plaque program, noting that some locally plaqued buildings do not appear on state or national registers and urging staff to compile a list to help the building department flag vulnerable properties. Several members also raised a possible legal concern: the same historical commission that objects to demolition might be the body that determines significance. Staff said they would ask the law office about that and whether a separate panel or procedure is used in other municipalities.
There was no formal vote on the draft ordinance. Staff said they will refine the wording, follow up with the law and building departments on notice, filing and enforcement questions, and return to the commission before forwarding any revised text to the ordinance committee and common council.
