Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Broadband topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Comcast seeks BEAD/capital-projects support; commissioners decline county endorsement after local providers raise concerns
Summary
Comcast presented a proposal to bring gig-symmetric fiber to 229 locations in Grand County and requested a county letter of support for a federal/state broadband funding application. Local provider representatives argued they already serve many of the addresses; after discussion commissioners voted not to provide a letter of support.
Comcast presented a proposed broadband expansion on Feb. 25 and requested a letter of support from the Grand County Board for a state/federal capital-projects round (described during the meeting as a BEAD/capital-projects fund reapplication). Comcast said the proposed scope would extend fiber to 229 locations (about 222 residences and nine businesses), provide gig-symmetric service at an agreed affordability tier, and take about 24 months to construct once funding is available.
Andy Davis, director of government affairs for Comcast, summarized the firm’s plan and said the company is offering a $94-per-month price for gig service to targeted locations and that the proposal would be scored in the state funding process. Thomas Johnson, Grand County IT director, told the board the county map shows many unserved or underserved locations and said he supports using available infrastructure funding to expand coverage regardless of provider.
Representatives of a local provider, identified in the meeting as Electrify / Zirkel (local operator that recently bought a county internet provider), argued they already provide high-speed wireless or fiber-capable service in many of the neighborhoods Comcast listed and warned federal grants risk duplicative buildouts that undercut local providers. Local speakers described rapid local upgrades and urged county support for locally based providers and for accountability in any funded projects.
After discussion the commissioners declined to sign a letter of support for Comcast’s application at this time and voted to withhold a county endorsement. Commissioners said existing local coverage and competition, and the potential for federal funds to be duplicated, warranted withholding the endorsement while staff and local providers continue coordination.
Ending: Comcast may still apply to the state program without county endorsement; county staff agreed to continue outreach and coordinate with local providers and the IT director on maps and coverage data to identify unserved locations ahead of future funding rounds.
