Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fire District Consolidation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jefferson County affirms Elk Creek board decision allowing North Fork consolidation to proceed
Summary
After oral arguments and review of the record, the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners voted to affirm Elk Creek Fire Protection District’s resolution excluding Jefferson County property, clearing the way for consolidation with North Fork Fire Protection District within Jefferson County.
Get email alerts on the Fire District Consolidation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners voted April 8 to affirm Elk Creek Fire Protection District’s November 2024 resolution excluding Jefferson County real property so those parcels may be consolidated into the North Fork Fire Protection District.
The decision followed oral arguments limited to the record of Elk Creek’s November 24 hearing. Commissioners said their authority was confined to determining whether the Elk Creek board’s record contained evidence supporting each statutory factor required for exclusion under the Colorado Special District Act.
Appellant Neil H. Whitehead III, an Elk Creek resident and elector, argued the Elk Creek board had improperly attempted to effect a full consolidation without the voter approval required under Title 32 consolidation provisions and that the exclusion hearing did not include the specific factual findings the statute requires. "To accomplish this result without seeking voter approval, the board of Elk Creek took...impermissible steps," Whitehead said in oral argument, and he asked the county to vacate the Elk Creek resolution.
Representing Elk Creek, John Camille of Lyons Gaddis, outside counsel for the district, said the county’s review is limited to whether the Elk Creek board considered the statutory factors and made findings. Camille told commissioners that the record and the resolution contain the necessary findings and that public testimony and written statements supported the board’s action.
County staff and counsel emphasized the narrow scope of review. The county attorney’s office advised the commissioners the board must base its decision on the record developed before Elk Creek’s board; the county may not consider communications or testimony submitted after that hearing.
After discussion the board voted to affirm the Elk Creek resolution. The clerk recorded: Commissioner Kerr — Aye; Commissioner Zenzinger — Aye; Commissioner Dahlkemper — Yes. The motion passed, and the board said the decision applies only to Jefferson County property in the Elk Creek service area; parts of the service area located in Park County are outside the county’s jurisdiction.
The board’s action affirms Elk Creek’s findings and allows the North Fork consolidation to proceed with respect to the Jefferson County parcels covered by the exclusion. Commissioners reiterated that their review was procedural and confined to the record from the Elk Creek hearing; they did not accept new testimony at today’s meeting.
Officials said the ruling does not change Park County parcels that were excluded under Elk Creek’s earlier action.
Looking ahead, county and district staff will follow statutory steps for consolidation and any required notifications in the consolidated areas.
