Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Finance Payment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nevada Board of Examiners approves up to $302,833 payment to U.S. Treasury

2980212 · March 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its March 18, 2025 meeting, the State of Nevada Board of Examiners approved a motion to authorize payment to the U.S. Treasury not to exceed $302,833 from the general fund, citing Senate Bill 511, Section 91 (2023). The motion passed with verbal ayes; individual vote counts were not recorded in the transcript.

The State of Nevada Board of Examiners on March 18, 2025, approved a motion authorizing a payment to the U.S. Treasury not to exceed $302,833 from the general fund, made “pursuant to Senate Bill 511, section 91 of the 2023 legislative session.”

The approval occurred at the board’s 11:30 a.m. meeting, held as a hybrid session in Carson City and Las Vegas. There was no recorded public comment on the agenda items during either public-comment period.

Miss Greenemeyer, identified in the record as the state controller, presented the item by citing the statutory language: “Pursuant to senate bill 5 11, section 91 of the 2023 legislative session, the state controller requests approval of a payment to the US Treasury in the amount not to exceed $302,833 from this general fund.” Attorney General Ford then moved approval: “I move for approval of agenda item number 3.” Governor Lombardo called for the voice vote, saying, “All those in favor, signify by saying aye.” The motion passed with verbal ayes; the transcript does not record individual roll-call votes or a numerical tally.

The board did not record substantive discussion or questions about the payment beyond a brief acknowledgment that there were no additional questions. The motion was presented as an item required by the cited legislative language; no alternative funding sources or contingencies were discussed in the transcript.

The board moved on after the vote to the second opportunity for public comment and then adjourned the portion of the meeting recorded in the provided transcript.