Owner seeking smaller addition at Hollow Oak Drive told to clear building‑inspector questions; hearing continued

Michael Baldock brought a revised proposal on April 7 to build a reduced-size addition at 32 Hollow Oak Drive. During the hearing the applicant said construction costs had forced extensive value‑engineering and he had scaled back his prior proposal, reducing square footage and eliminating a planned kitchen renovation. He then realized a rotated stair and deck detail in revised drawings had pushed a corner of the proposed covered deck beyond an existing nonconforming setback.

Members and building staff discussed whether the board must act. Planning staff quoted Section 24.40 of the bylaw: alterations that do not increase a structure’s existing nonconformity may be handled administratively by the building inspector. The board advised Baldock to consult the building inspector to determine whether his revised plan increases the nonconforming condition; if it does not, the building inspector can issue a permit without further ZBA action. If the inspector determines the change increases the nonconformity, the applicant must return for ZBA review. Baldock said he would rework the deck geometry or the covered area to remain within the existing nonconforming footprint and contact the building inspector.

The board continued the hearing to May 12 to allow Baldock to resolve the setback concern with the building inspector or to submit revised plans for the board’s review.