Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners table Revive Land Group’s Kegel Road residential rezoning for further right-of-way review

2979821 · March 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A proposed residential-mixed rezoning for about 101.57 acres on Kegel Road from Revive Land Group LLC was tabled to allow commissioners to review traffic and right-of-way implications; the applicant described a mixed product of single-family lots and townhomes and proffered on-street parking and amenities.

The Hall County Board of Commissioners on March 27 tabled a rezoning request from Revive Land Group LLC for a 101.57-acre site on Kegel Road to a future meeting so the commission could examine road and right-of-way issues.

Applicant presentation and discrepancy in lot counts: The applicant, Neville Allison, presented a proposal described in the record with differing lot counts: county staff summarized the request as a 248-lot residential development in the agenda summary, while the applicant described the project to commissioners as a 262-lot subdivision with 207 single-family detached homes and 55 townhomes and an amenity package. The applicant said the project adopts the county's recently updated Unified Development Code (RX category) and produces a mix of housing types intended to be lower-density than the maximum allowed by the comprehensive plan in that corridor.

Project features: The applicant said the plan includes 207 single-family lots with varied widths (including 54 lots wider than 50 feet) and 55 two-story townhomes, resort-style amenities including a pool, clubhouse and dog park, and about 51 on-street parking spaces added at stakeholders' request. The presentation emphasized market need for additional attainable housing and said the developer had incorporated planning and engineering input.

Why commissioners tabled it: After the presentation a commissioner said they had concerns about road impacts and right-of-way and moved to table the item to a later meeting (April 22) so the commission could discuss right-of-way needs and other traffic-management concerns. The item was tabled to April 22 for further review.

Next steps: The applicant and county staff will continue to work on traffic and right-of-way questions and the item will return for further consideration on April 22.