Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Safe Streets Grant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discussion of Safe Streets grant and Vision Zero goal ends without a vote
Summary
A county presentation on a Safe Streets for All grant and a resolution to adopt Vision Zero-style goals (50% reduction by 2030 and zero deaths by 2040 on county roads) produced extended debate; no motion was made and the resolution died at the meeting.
County staff presented a Safe Streets for All grant effort and a draft resolution setting a goal of reducing fatal and serious-injury crashes on county-owned roads by 50% by 2030 and working toward zero traffic deaths and serious injuries by 2040. Commissioners discussed next steps and the potential for seeking construction grants tied to the study's findings, but no motion to adopt the resolution was made.
Public works or safety project lead Donny Baggett (presenter name as recorded) explained the grant's timeline and the role of a safety action plan. "In 2023, Habersham County was awarded the Safe Streets for All grant... the safety action plan draft is due by June fifteenth of 2025," Baggett said, describing stakeholder meetings and the federal grant schedule.
Baggett said the grant covered an engineering and planning phase (federal funds with a 20% in-kind match) and that a future construction grant could follow to implement identified infrastructure improvements. "This study puts us ahead of the other folks that will be applying for the grant because we actually followed their procedure on doing this," a county representative said during debate.
Several commissioners expressed concern about staff time, federal grant requirements and whether the county should pursue construction funding that could carry long-term obligations or conditions. One commissioner said, "I'm a vote I'm a no vote. I mean, we spend millions and millions... at some point, somebody gotta say no to something." Other commissioners asked about the potential to use study results to prioritize SPLOST projects or to save county funds if federal construction dollars could be secured.
At the end of discussion, no motion was offered; a board member noted, "I guess we need to have a vote on this... I hear no motion. It dies." The safety action plan work will continue under staff direction and may return to the board for future consideration; no formal county commitment to construction funding was made that evening.
Ending: Staff said a draft safety action plan will be completed in the coming months and may be presented to the board for consideration of future grant applications or project prioritization.
