Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Orting City Council actions, March 26, 2025
Summary
Summary of motions and final outcomes recorded at the Orting City Council meeting on March 26: consent agenda approved, bridge change orders approved, and automated school-zone camera RFP approved. All motions passed by voice vote with no opposing votes recorded.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its March 26 meeting, the Orting City Council recorded three formal actions in the public record: approval of the consent agenda (claims and payroll vouchers and minutes), authorization of change orders for the Orting Emergency Evacuation Bridge, and approval to issue a request for proposals for automated school zone enforcement cameras. All motions were approved by voice vote with no recorded opposing votes.
Details
- Consent agenda: Motion to approve the consent agenda (claims voucher list dated March 26, 2025, voucher numbers 57046–57106 totaling $1,449,963.84, electronic fund transfers $19,904.40, grand total $1,469,868.24; payroll vouchers and deposits with grand total $229,011.81; minutes dated March 12, 2025; and AB 2,527 Sponsorship from the CGA committee). Motion made by Councilmember Hogan, seconded by Councilmember Moore; motion passed by voice vote.
- Orting Emergency Evacuation Bridge change orders: Motion to authorize execution of change order No. 2 ($323,530.85), No. 3 ($106,501.56) and No. 4 ($25,669.80) for a revised contract total of $7,423,061.36 for contract 2024-01 with Quigg Brothers Incorporated. Motion made by Councilmember Hogan, seconded by Councilmember Sprowl; motion passed by voice vote.
- Automated school zone enforcement cameras (AB 2514): Motion to post a request for proposals for automated school zone enforcement cameras and begin vendor selection. Motion made by Councilmember Holland, seconded by Councilmember Hogan; motion passed by voice vote.
All three motions were recorded as having unanimous support among councilmembers in attendance; no nays or abstentions were noted in the meeting record.
