Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stormwater Utility topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public Works funds second phase of stormwater utility feasibility study

2978975 · February 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee authorized a $272,710 amendment with CDM Smith to advance mapping, outreach and pricing analysis needed to evaluate a possible stormwater utility in Norwalk.

The Norwalk City Public Works Committee approved a second‑phase contract amendment with CDM Smith at its February meeting to advance a feasibility study for a potential stormwater utility.

The amendment, not to exceed $272,710, will fund a more detailed analysis following CDM Smith’s preliminary study: mapping impervious surfaces across city parcels, designing public outreach and perception surveys, forming a stakeholder advisory committee, and producing a pricing and billing model. Committee members and staff emphasized the work is exploratory and said no decision on a utility has been made.

Vanessa Valadares, Public Works staff, told the committee the second phase is intended to provide the “necessary steps” for the city to return to full council with quantified impacts if the city chooses to pursue a stormwater utility. Valadares said the study will include public education and a stakeholder committee to represent different property types and neighborhoods.

Committee member Nora Majelski Aitner said she supports advancing the study and asked that the advisory group reflect Norwalk’s diversity so impacts on different businesses and residential zones are clearly assessed.

The committee directed staff to form a stakeholder advisory group and schedule outreach; staff said those items will be part of the study deliverables. No utility ordinance or fee structure was adopted at the meeting — the amendment funds analysis and public engagement only.

Ending

Staff indicated the study’s results and any formal recommendation would return to the committee and council for deliberation.